----- Original Message ----- > On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote: > > > The concept of v4 to v6 addressing scale doesn't match the pricing > > scale, though. Generally, I expect to see most ISPs find themselves > > 1 rank higher in the v6 model compared to v4, which effectively > > doubles your price anyways. :) > > Not sure I understand that one. > > /19 = 500 /29s > > /32 = 64,000 /48s > > Shouldn't the v6 blocks be a lot bigger? > > Chris
Yes, they should be. Someone with a /19 would likely be looking at larger than a /32. Under proposal 121, it would be a /28, which would double the fee. I would imagine that the fee structure would have to change somehow, since /31 and /30, for example, won't even be an option. -Randy
