> You must be kiddin'... You're considering going through this mess again > in a few decades?
I'm mildly surprised if you think we're going to be done with *this* mess in a few decades. Rob
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Owen DeLong
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Owen DeLong
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... George Herbert
- RE: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Jamie Bowden
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... TJ
- RE: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Jamie Bowden
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Lamar Owen
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Fernando Gont
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Rob Evans
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Fernando Gont
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... George Herbert
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Eugen Leitl
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Jack Bates
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... bmanning
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Jack Bates
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Owen DeLong
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Mark Andrews
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Jack Bates
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 o... Mark Andrews
