On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:14:57PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote: > On Feb 1, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Jack Bates wrote: > > There are many cases where ULA is a perfect fit, and to work > > around it seems silly and reduces the full capabilities of IPv6. I > > fully expect to see protocols and networks within homes which will > > take full advantage of ULA. I also expect to see hosts which don't > > talk to the public internet directly and never need a GUA. > > > I guess we can agree to disagree about this. I haven't seen one yet.
What would your recommended solution be then for disconnected networks? Every home user and enterprise user requests GUA directly from their RIR/NIR/LIR at a cost of hunderds of dollars per year or more?
