On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:43 PM, George Bonser wrote: >> >> 3. Busting out 16 more /8s only delays the IPv4 endgame by about a >> year. >> >> jms > > If used for general assignment, sure. But if used for what people have > been begging for NAT444 middle-4 space. Well, that might work. Code > update on the CPE is all it would take. The systems involved would > never see it. > >
If they could do code updates on the CPE, then, they could use RFC-1918. The problem is that code-updating that much CPE is, well, impractical to say the least. Owen
