Discussed, Disgusted, and Dismissed. The E space would take more software upgrades to existing systems than just deploying IPv6.
Owen On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Jeremy wrote: > Has there been any discussion about allocating the Class E blocks? If this > doesn't count as "future use" what does? (Yes, I realize this doesn't *fix* > the problem here) > > -Jeremy > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jack Carrozzo <j...@crepinc.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> IPv4's not dead yet; even the first RIR exhaustion probable in 3 - >>> 6 months doesn't end the IPv4 ride. >>> >>> There is some hope more IPv4 organizations will start thinking about >>> their plans for establishing connectivity with IPv6; so they can >>> commmunicate with IPv6-only hosts that will begin to emerge >>> later. >>> >> >> What organizations (eye networks) will do is layer NAT till the cows come >> home for some years to come. Buckle up! >> >> -Jack Carrozzo >>
