On 7 Jan 2011, at 06:11, Owen DeLong wrote: > > That's a draft, and, it doesn't really eliminate the idea that /48s are > generally > a good thing so much as it recognizes that there might be SOME circumstances > in which they are either not necessary or insufficient. > > As a draft, it hasn't been through the full process and shouldn't be > considered > to have the same weight as an RFC. > > While it intends to obsolete RFC-3177, it doesn't obsolete it yet and, > indeed, may > never do so.
The IETF data tracker shows draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites is under IESG review, with comments currently being made, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites/ which also notes the draft has strong support so is likely to be published soon. The document is only guidance regardless. Tim
