we'll if ICANN't .. maybe HECANN (*trying out humor*). this idea of second internet doesn't make sense. icann alone is already a handful.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Ken <k...@sizone.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:20:17PM -0600, Beavis said: > >I come across this interesting link. > > > >http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828&tag=nl.e036 > > > >Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure? > > Funny, tho - being succeptible to govt pressure CREATES an alt root DNS > structure. You'd think the smart thinkers in the govt woulda figured > that out. Apply pressure and it splinters. Sometimes easier to supervise > if its in one pile, no? > > Also, "new DNS = whole new internet"? lol. > > /kc > -- > Ken Chase - k...@heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA > Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 > Front St. W. > > -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Disclaimer: http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
