And if I ever find the genius who came up with the "we are not the internet police" meme ...
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let's put it this way. > > 1. If you host government agencies, provide connectivity to say a > nuclear power plant or an army base, or a bank or .. .. - you'd > certainly work with your customers to meet their security > requirements. > > 2. If you are a service provider serving up DSL - why then, there are > some governments (say Australia) that have blacklists of child porn > sites - and I think Interpol came up with something similar too. And > yes there's CALEA and a few other such things .. not much more that's > new. > > Separating rhetoric and military metaphors will help you see this a > lot more clearly. As will not dismissing the entire idea with > contempt. > > As a service provider for anything at all, you'll see your share of attacks. > > Whether coordinated by 4chan or by comrade joe chan shouldnt really > matter, except at the level where you work with law enforcement etc to > coordinate a response that goes beyond the technical. [And ALL > responses to these are not going to restrict themselves to being > solvable by technical means]. > > --srs > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Michael Smith <mich...@hmsjr.com> wrote: >> How is "what to block" identified? ...by content key words? ..traffic >> profiles / signatures? Deny all, unless flow (addresses/protocol/port) is >> pre-approved / registered? >> >> What does the technical solution look like? >> >> Any solutions to maintain some semblance of freedom? >> > > > > -- > Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com) > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
