On 12/01/2010 10:41 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > the more i think about this, the more i am inclined to consider a second > trusted root not (easily) attackable by the usg, who owns the root now, > or the acta vigilantes. as dissent becomes less tolerated, let alone > supported, we may want to attempt to ensure it in our deployments. > > randy > Before we do this, I do have some other questions:
Wasn't this exactly why people suggested ICANN should just move to Switzerland and become an independent international organization ? Would this still be possibility ? An other question, how much does ICANN really have to say about the content of the root ? Isn't their a long process to get something in/out of the root and isn't it the root operators that decide to actually deploy the zone ?
