On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 12/1/2010 3:37 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> 
>> Or just have disparate networks using the same ASN.  Works fine.
>> 
>> Why waste ASNs and try to explain to others how asX,Y,Z, etc., are all the 
>> same company?
> 
> I dislike the problem of routes not being accepted with my ASN in it. There's 
> workarounds, but they are all ugly.

Having islands which point default is not ugly.  They are probably pointing 
default anyway.

If not, typing "nei $FOO allowas-in" is also not ugly, IMHO.

But your network, your decision.  Mine runs fine like that.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


Reply via email to