On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Jack Bates wrote: > On 12/1/2010 3:37 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >> >> Or just have disparate networks using the same ASN. Works fine. >> >> Why waste ASNs and try to explain to others how asX,Y,Z, etc., are all the >> same company? > > I dislike the problem of routes not being accepted with my ASN in it. There's > workarounds, but they are all ugly.
Having islands which point default is not ugly. They are probably pointing default anyway. If not, typing "nei $FOO allowas-in" is also not ugly, IMHO. But your network, your decision. Mine runs fine like that. -- TTFN, patrick