I think that the MTU on LO is pretty irrelevant in general. If it does matter, larger is probably better.
Owen On Nov 17, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Deric Kwok wrote: > Hi > > I just see that the mtu in lo is different from standard eth 1500 > > Any meaning of it? > > eg: > Standard eth 1500 > > in linux. lo mtu 16436 > > in solaris. lo mtu is 8232 > > How about cisco / juniper loopback? > > Thank you so much
