On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:29:11 +1100 Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote:
> > In message <4cbfa9bb.9030...@matthew.at>, Matthew Kaufman writes: > > ULA + PA can have the same problems, especially if your ULA is > > inter-organization ULA, which was one of the cases under discussion. > > Which still isn't a problem. Presumably you want your inter-organization > traffic to use ULA addresses to talk to each other so you setup the > address selection rules to do just that. That requires new rules > being distributed to all nodes that need to talk to the other site. > Presumable DHCPv6 could do this. If there isn't yet a DHCP option > to request address selection rules we need to define one. One is being defined - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujisaki-6man-addr-select-opt/ > Use a > VPN between the organisations so you fate share. If you have a > private interconnect then the VPN becomes the backup. > > > Matthew Kaufman > > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
