On 10/19/10 3:58 PM, "Mark Andrews" <ma...@isc.org> wrote:
> Adding is seperate IPv6 server is a work around and runs the risk > of being overloaded. And what a wonderful problem to have! You can show a CFO a nice cacti graph of IPv6 growth so you can justify him/her to sign off on IPv6 expenses. A CFO will never act unless there is a real business problem. There are some of us here who have management with clue but there are many that don't, sadly this is the majority and a large contributor to the slow adoption of IPv6. Zaid
