The knowhow for BGP in that environment is all of about 30 minutes worth of
training. They should find a way to get it, IMHO.

Owen

On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Jonathon Exley wrote:

> It also scales better from the SP point of view. If you have 1000 L3VPN 
> services on your PE node using OSPF to the customer that would require a lot 
> of memory for the multiple LSDBs and a lot of CPU for the SPF calculations.
> BGP is nicer but the reality is that many enterprises don't have the 
> know-how. 
> 
> Jonathon 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, 2 October 2010 12:39 a.m.
> To: Tim Franklin
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: RIP Justification
> 
> On 1 October 2010 12:19, Tim Franklin <t...@pelican.org> wrote:
>> Or BGP.  Why not?
> 
> Of course, technically you could use almost any routing protocol.
> OSPF and IS-IS would require more configuration and maintenance, BGP even 
> more still.
> 
> I think this is a pretty good example though of how RIPv2 is probably the 
> most appropriate for the job. It doesnt require further configuration from 
> the provider side as new sites are added and is very simple to set up and 
> maintain.
> 
> This email and attachments: are confidential; may be protected by
> privilege and copyright; if received in error may not be used,copied,
> or kept; are not guaranteed to be virus-free; may not express the
> views of Kordia(R); do not designate an information system; and do not
> give rise to any liability for Kordia(R).
> 


Reply via email to