> -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Eisenberg > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:32 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked? > from the list. > > But an email that says "I'm going to deliberately withhold all of the > vital information I used to come to this conclusion, but request that > you take action anyways" is going to consistently be roundfiled. > > Nathan >
Maybe you didn't recognize the original poster, but I did, and I would take what he had to say at least seriously enough to have a look. His followup mail, while not giving people the information they wanted (as if it really matters) did mention that the upstream appears to have cut them off. That is a pretty good indication that *something* was going on there. I don't believe it is anyone's job here to conform to the expectations of anyone else aside from general list etiquette and some level of sanity. He put the information out, it is up to the reader in how they weight it. I don't understand your continued banging on the issue. All he did was put information out there. He doesn't need to meet your criteria, you are free to apply that as you will in the privacy of your own cubicle. G
