To add on to that. Recently Wireshark Network Analysis was released. It's an excellent book covering wireshark and reading packet captures in general by Laura Chappell. I just finished reading it and I have to say it's an excellent book. Highly recommended.
Between those two books I think you'll be very close to being a wireshark/packet capture guru. I hope this helps, -Tim Eberhard On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Joe Hamelin <j...@nethead.com> wrote: > In a situation like yours I found Internet Core Protocols: The > Definitive Guide by Eric Hall an easy to read guide to insuring that > what you are seeing via wireshark. I was able to find an issue with > the DF bit in a load balancer that was causing confounding headaches > in a network using wireshark and this book. > > Walk it through the syn-ack dance and don't trust that the devices are > handling it correctly. Start at one end and work your way through and > insure to YOUR satisfaction that every device proscribes to the > protocol. Don't rush, don't jump to conclusions. Just follow the > packet. That's the best advice I can give you. > > > http://oreilly.com/catalog/9781565925724/ > -- > Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Abel Alejandro > <aalejan...@worldnetpr.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > This past week I have been trying to find the root cause of tcp > > performance problems of a few clients that are using a third party metro > > Ethernet for transport. RFC2544 tests (Layer 2) and iperf using UDP give > > good symmetric performance almost 100% the speed of the circuit. However > > all kind of TCP tests result in some kind of asymmetrical deficiency, > > either the upstream or downstream of the client is hugely different. The > > latency is not a huge factor since all the metro Ethernet connections > > have less than 2 ms. > > > > So the question basically if is there a good tutorial or white paper for > > troubleshooting tcp with emphasis of using tools like Wireshark to debug > > and track this kind of problems. > > > > Regards, > > Abel. > > > > > > > > > > > >