> The list seems to be showing relays that announce both the IPv4 and the > IPv6 anycast prefixes. > > I have noticed a number of deployments that announce the (in)famous IPv4 > prefix and then consider their deployment complete. I suspect that there > is a lack of 2002::/16 announcements and this would be contributing to > the regular problems with return paths. > > Obviously the IPv6 content networks benefit the most from having a relay > translating back to IPv4. > > Anyone have experience with this? > > -- > Graham Beneke > >
Is there a reason not to advertise more specific prefixes from 2002::/16 to ensure that traffic for your v4 routes comes back to your own 6to4 router? If for example all my users have v4 addresses in 192.0.2.0/24, I could advertise 2002:C002:0000::/40 instead of or in addition to the full 2002::/16. Cheers. Mitchell
