On 30/08/2010 23:47, Franck Martin wrote:
found it:
http://www.bgpmon.net/6to4.php?week=4
Not what I call a big list, considering...
The list seems to be showing relays that announce both the IPv4 and the
IPv6 anycast prefixes.
I have noticed a number of deployments that announce the (in)famous IPv4
prefix and then consider their deployment complete. I suspect that there
is a lack of 2002::/16 announcements and this would be contributing to
the regular problems with return paths.
Obviously the IPv6 content networks benefit the most from having a relay
translating back to IPv4.
Anyone have experience with this?
--
Graham Beneke
