On 30/08/2010 23:47, Franck Martin wrote:
found it:

http://www.bgpmon.net/6to4.php?week=4

Not what I call a big list, considering...

The list seems to be showing relays that announce both the IPv4 and the IPv6 anycast prefixes.

I have noticed a number of deployments that announce the (in)famous IPv4 prefix and then consider their deployment complete. I suspect that there is a lack of 2002::/16 announcements and this would be contributing to the regular problems with return paths.

Obviously the IPv6 content networks benefit the most from having a relay translating back to IPv4.

Anyone have experience with this?

--
Graham Beneke

Reply via email to