On 08/28/2010 11:39 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2010-08-28 18:20 +0900), Randy Bush wrote: > > >> a bgp regression suite would not have caught this as it was not a >> repeat. but it sure would be useful to implementors. >> > Naturally 'proving' that non-trivial software works is practically > impossible. But stating what non-existing test-suite would or would not > have covered is not a topic I'm particularly interested to engage. > > > I suggest the test-tool has 2 bgp-sessions and tests if what it put in did or did not come out on the otherside and in what shape or form.
There are already atleast 2 projects which have BGP-code which could probably be adapted: http://code.google.com/p/exabgp/ http://code.google.com/p/bgpsimple/ Can I suggest a fuzzer as wel ?
