"Has anyone ever heard of a multi-homed enterprise not running bgp with
either of 2 providers, but instead, each provider statically routes a block
to their common customer and also each originates this block in BGP?”

As stated before...yes this is a common practice.

"One of the ISP's in this case owns the block and has even provided a letter of
authorization to the other, allowing them to announce it in BGP as well.”

Yes, one ISP owns the block, both will aggregate the blocks and announce the 
blocks to the global internet. BGP attributes will shape best path for routing; 
i.e., AS-PATH, ORIGIN, LOCAL PREF. MEDS should take care of "leaking" routes. 

So, is this design scheme viable? Yes, it is.

~Jay Murphy 
IP Network Specialist
NM State Government
 
IT Services Division
PSB – IP Network Management Center
Santa Fé, New México 87505 
 
"We move the information that moves your world." 
“Good engineering demands that we understand what we’re doing and why, keep an 
open mind, and learn from experience.”
“Engineering is about finding the sweet spot between what's solvable and what 
isn't."
               Radia Perlman
 Please consider the environment before printing e-mail


-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Cornman [mailto:bstym...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 2:50 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Strange practices?

Has anyone ever heard of a multi-homed enterprise not running bgp with
either of 2 providers, but instead, each provider statically routes a block
to their common customer and also each originates this block in BGP?   One
of the ISP's in this case owns the block and has even provided a letter of
authorization to the other, allowing them to announce it in BGP as well.
  I had personally never heard of this and am curious if this is a common
practice as well as if this would potentially create any problems by 2
Autonomous Systems both originating the same prefix.

Thanks

-Bill


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including all attachments is for the sole 
use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited unless specifically provided under the New Mexico Inspection of 
Public Records Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender and destroy all copies of this message. -- This email has been scanned 
by the Sybari - Antigen Email System. 



Reply via email to