> Interestingly, the article misses interception and other non-outage > potentials due to (sub) prefix hijacking.
you seem to be entering the world of attacks. the AP article's point was fat fingers. randy
> Interestingly, the article misses interception and other non-outage > potentials due to (sub) prefix hijacking.
you seem to be entering the world of attacks. the AP article's point was fat fingers. randy