richard.bar...@gmail.com (Richard Barnes) wrote: > OARC did a performance study of a few name servers in the context of > root zone scaling, but it should be generalizable: > <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/wessels-root-zone.pdf>
Note this study compares BIND and NSD only, and under a very specific set of conditions only, namely, serving a single large zone. Geoff (co-author of the study) > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There are a large number of DNS servers available. See for example > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_server_software > > > > Does anyone know of good performance comparisons, especially for high > > end applications with lots of data/zones and/or high query/update > > rates?> From nanog@nanog.org > From: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: DNS performance... > Date: 5 May 10 14:48:12 GMT > > OARC did a performance study of a few name servers in the context of > root zone scaling, but it should be generalizable: > <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/wessels-root-zone.pdf> > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There are a large number of DNS servers available. See for example > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_server_software > > > > Does anyone know of good performance comparisons, especially for high > > end applications with lots of data/zones and/or high query/update > > rates?
