On 27/04/2010 18:48, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > Anyone inventing a new service/protocol that doesn't work with NAT isn't > planning on success.
You mean, like multisession bgp over tls? Nick, just sayin'
On 27/04/2010 18:48, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > Anyone inventing a new service/protocol that doesn't work with NAT isn't > planning on success.
You mean, like multisession bgp over tls? Nick, just sayin'