Yep, home server, your server. That's not the same when you have customers who rely on your server. IMHO, port 22 and other critical ports should always be blocked except from known places.This is also blocking Sina, Netease, Yahoo.cn and other major Chinese ISP/ESP. Am I the only to think this is not very smart?It depends. I'am not a fan of country blocking. But in my case it can work for a home server. You could adapt the list and block port 22 only for production servers where you can't expect to never have email from China, but can safely block brute force ssh attacks.
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... James Hess
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... goemon
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 41... George Bonser
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 C... Larry Smith
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 C... Michael Holstein
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 41... Benjamin BILLON
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... Jeroen van Aart
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... Benjamin Billon
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... Jeroen van Aart
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... Benjamin Billon
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... Jim Burwell
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... Patrick Giagnocavo
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -&g... Jeroen van Aart
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Rich Kulawiec
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China... Jeroen van Aart
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 C... Warren Bailey
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 41... Jim Templin
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Daniel Karrenberg
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Daniel Karrenberg