On Apr 8, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Hello Lee ,
>
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Lee Howard wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Joe Greco [mailto:jgr...@ns.sol.net]
>>> It seems like you could run an RIR more cheaply by simply handing out
>>> the space fairly liberally, which would have the added benefit of
>>> encouraging v6 adoption. The lack of a need for onerous contractual
>>> clauses as suggested above, combined with less overhead costs, ought
>>> to make v6 really cheap.
>>
>> For "fairly liberally" see:
>> For ISPs: https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six51
>> You have to be an ISP with a plan to have 200 assignment in 5 years
>> Non-ISP: https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six58
>> Be not-an-ISP and have a need for addresses (per other policies,
>> you get to choose which one).
>>
>> In another post you asked essentially "why does ARIN charge so much?"
>> ARIN doesn't just maintain a notebook of address assignments. There are
>> HA servers for Whois, IN-ADDR. and IP6.ARPA, research in things like
>> SIDR, DNSsec, other tools-services, and educational outreach on IPv6.
>> You suggest that there's much less to argue about in IPv6 policy, but if
>> you look at current proposals (https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/)
>> you'll see three that are IPv6-specific, and most of the others cover
>> both IPv4 and IPv6. So ARIN will continue to maintain the mailing
>> lists, and hold public policy meetings (with remote participation, so
>> anyone can participate), and facilitate elections so you can throw the
>> bums out if you don't like how we do things.
>>
>> We don't really know how much IPv6 will cost ARIN. If there were
>> no more debate about allocation policies, and nobody else had any interest
>> in us (politically or litigiously), and technology were fairly static, then
>> we
>> might just do periodic tech refreshes and be fine. I imagine all of those
>> things will continue for a while, though, and ARIN will need to be
>> financially solvent through the transition.
>>
>>
>> Your ARIN fee does not cover me posting here. That's gratis, and
>> worth it.
>>
>> Lee
> Thank you for posting those URL's I find a completely different
> interpretation to the prose there .
>
> <Quote>
> 6.5.8. Direct assignments from ARIN to end-user organizations
> 6.5.8.1. Criteria
>
> To qualify for a direct assignment, an organization must:
>
> 1. not be an IPv6 LIR; and
> 2. qualify for an IPv4 assignment or allocation from ARIN under the IPv4
> policy currently in effect, or "demonstrate efficient utilization of all
> direct IPv4 assignments and allocations, each of which must be covered by any
> current ARIN RSA", or be a qualifying Community Network as defined in Section
> 2.8, with assignment criteria defined in section 6.5.9.
> </Quote>
>
> Note the ""'d section above . I as a Legacy holder of netname
> baby-dragons HAVE to have a Signed RSA with Airn or I am NOT , by definition
> , Qualified .
>
You must meet 1 (not be an IPv6 LIR)
You must meet one of the criteria in 2.
Any ONE of:
+ Qualify for an IPv4 assignment or allocation under current ARIN policy
OR "demonstrate efficient utilization of all direct IPv4 assignments and
allocations, each of which must..."
OR be a qualifying Community Network as defined in section 2.8...
> I find the present lRSA an indecent attempt to undermine the present
> Legacy ipv4 holders view of the rights presented them at the time of their
> Assignments or Allocations . If I could find my OLD Ultrix Tarball or Dump
> tapes from that era , and they are still readable , I might just be able to
> present the conversations I had at that time with InterNIC while acquiring
> that Legacy Space .
> Might someone else have a Document or some other Recorded conversation ?
What, exactly do you find so onerous in the LRSA?
Would it be equally onerous if ARIN simply stopped providing RDNS for you?
Owen
> Twyl , JimL
>
> ps: Back to haunting mode .
> --
> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
> | Network&System Engineer | 3237 Holden Road | Give me Linux |
> | bab...@baby-dragons.com | Fairbanks, AK. 99709 | only on AXP |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
