If you are an end-user type organization, the fee is only $100/year for all your resources, IPv4 and IPv6 included. Is that really what you would call significant?
Owen On Apr 7, 2010, at 1:59 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote: > Yah, thats what we are thinking here. We'll probably stick with IP4 only. > > Sounds like ARIN has set a trap, so that virtually any contact with them > will result in the ceding of legacy rights. > We'll be sure to avoid any such contact. > Thanks everyone for the info. > > John > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Greco" <jgr...@ns.sol.net> > To: "Owen DeLong" <o...@delong.com> > Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org> > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:31 PM > Subject: Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space > > >> It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's >> moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to >> a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space. >> We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the annual fee. As it stands, there >> isn't that much reason to do IPv6, and a significant disincentive in the >> form of the fees. >> ... JG >> -- > >
