Mark Smith <na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org> wrote:
> Has anybody considered lobbying the IEEE to do a point to point version > of Ethernet to gets rid of addressing fields? [...] > Actually the minimum 64 byte packet size could probably go too, as that > was only there for collision detection. And maybe rename it to something else while you are at it? All those people who have hijacked the name "Ethernet" for PtP links (all those "Ethernet" UTP media are really PtP at the physical level, unlike real coaxial Ethernet) are despicable thieves - now those of us who are still using the original coaxial Ethernet in the shared bus mode are left without a clear, unique and distinctive name we once had to refer to what we use. MS
