On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > On Mar 4, 2010, at 2:30 PM, William Herrin wrote: >> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today? > > We do? > > Why do we expect this?
David, Well, I don't know that "we" do, but Joel made a remarkable assertion that non-aggregable assignments to end users, the ones still needed for multihoming, would go down under IPv6. I wondered about his reasoning. Stan then offered the surprising clarification that a reduction in the use of NAT would naturally result in a reduction of multihoming. Regards, Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
