On Feb 22, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Steven Bellovin: > >> Right; I was not seriously suggesting that the DNS was the right >> spot for it. I am seriously suggesting that a redirect mechanism -- >> perhaps the email equivalent of HTPP's 301/302 -- would be worth >> considering. Then, of course, there's problem of upgrading the >> $\aleph_0$ mail senders out there to comply... > > There's already SMTP support for this, see RFC 5321, section 3.4. > This has been carried over from RFC 821, which already contain the > 251/551 response codes.
Thanks; I'd forgotten about those. > > However, this is still a public database for which you cannot charge > access, so it's not the solution we're looking for. > --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb