On 2/22/2010 11:22 AM, Mustafa Golam - wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Larry Sheldon <larryshel...@cox.net>wrote: > > >> >> An email address that ends in example.com irrevocably ties the address >> user to the company Example and may in fact be affirmatively harmful >> beyond the technical difficulty of implementation. >>
I don't think I said the following line--if I was demented enough to have done that, I retract it. >> IMHO, ISPs would be forged to take Google's policy of Email addresses. > > x...@gmail.com for beta-users, like you and me; while x...@google.com for > employees. But surely it will create technical implication along with many > others. And I am talking about places that people that have no connection with g[.*] The key that I missed, and we have to hope the pols did not is that question of ownership. I think you will see a drying up of availability of email--which has interesting implications in the realm of unique addresses possible, for example. -- "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
