On Feb 14, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jason Frisvold wrote: > On Feb 14, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >> How does that help? It still sends port 53 requests to the authorities, >> which will be intercepted. > > Hrm.. Maybe I misunderstood. Are the packets being intercepted, or is the > problem the local resolvers?
While I admit I have not read every post in the thread, I note the subject line. :) > Well, in either case, another option would be to use something like openvpn, > cisco vpn, etc. with very limited routes. Set it up so only your dns traffic > is sent over the tunnel. Then you can still use the local network, crappy as > it may be, without having to deal with the added overhead of ssh and the like. ISTM Randy's comment about SSH tunnels would have the same effect. -- TTFN, patrick
