> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 22:38 > To: Owen DeLong > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Once you start planning a practical address plan, IPv6 isn't as big as > >> everybody keeps saying... > > > > It's more than big enough for any deployment I've seen so far with > plenty > > of room to spare. > > Oh good! so the us-DoD's /10 request is getting filled when?
The US DoD has the equivalent of a /13 ... what is the question? /TJ
