CSR isnt $0 ROI. Unless they're doing it wrong. Which they aren't. You're not paid by them and you're arguing FOR them.
Well played, Google. /kc On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:28:10PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore's said: >On Dec 21, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Corey Travioli wrote: > >>> Another one from the "Evil Doer" >>> http://www.google.com/advertising/holiday2009/ >>> Wish the guys from Redmond and others copy this action too ... > >> So what they are saying is because we as individuals are too cheep >> to give to charity they are giving in our stead to shame us. Yup, that is >> evil. > >I know it's off-topic, but I'm impressed with the idea that a public corporation can spend 8 figures on something that has essentially $0 ROI and multiple people here can find bad things about it. > >I'm shocked someone didn't say "but that's only 0.0000$WHATEVER percent of their profit!". > >Google does many things which can be argued as evil, or not, but I would say this is very much not one of them. > >-- >TTFN, >patrick > -- Ken Chase - k...@heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
