Matthew Petach wrote:
Take a look at the reverse DNS for the entire 66.163.178.0/23 subnet; you'll find that when you're doing things at large scale, you can't really get away from having sequentially numbered reverse DNS entries all in a row, exactly as you seem to think "Nobody has". :/
Of course not. Everyone is small like me. Having more than 10 mail servers? How dare you use incremental numbers on such a large scale!
Jack
