Remember to request some quotes for MX-80, not yet released , soon to be out "lower end" routers.
and MX240 3Ds. http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/routing/mx-series/mx240/ Normally Juniper sales guys don't quote you things that are coming out soon unless you specially ask for this. mehmet On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote: > Thanks everybody for the feedback. I'll likely be getting a few quotes for > MX series boxes I think, we're in the happy position of having a > completely e-net infrastructure so we're not limited by interface options. > > Thanks again for recommendation, good to know other people are using them > successfully. > > Cheers > > Gary > >> MX uses the I-Chip same as on M120/320 series. MX would be perfect for >> any >> location in the network P/PE if you are talking about E-Net services vs. >> TDM. They would be a perfect peering box if you are using E-Net. >> >> >> On 11/16/09 10:14 AM, "Gary Mackenzie" <net-...@monolith-networks.net> >> wrote: >> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:04, Dale W. Carder <dwcar...@wisc.edu> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Having slightly lost track of what everybody is using for peering >>>>>> routers >>>>>> these days, what is the consensus about the best alternative to >>>>>> Juniper >>>>>> M >>>>>> series routers? >>>>> >>>>> have you looked at the MX series? >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> ~Chris >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dale >>>>> >>> >>> I had looked briefly, does anybody here actually use them as peering >>> routers? I've seen a few implementations using them in the MPLS P and PE >>> router roles but never as border routers. >>> >>> If there is some precedent for using them in this role that's good to >>> hear >>> and I'll take another look, I was loath to move away from Juniper as our >>> current boxes are been the model of reliability. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> >> >> >> *************************************************************************************** >> The information contained in this message, including attachments, may >> contain >> privileged or confidential information that is intended to be delivered >> only to the >> person identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the >> person >> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, >> Windstream requests >> that you immediately notify the sender and asks that you do not read the >> message or its >> attachments, and that you delete them without copying or sending them to >> anyone else. >> > > >
