> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:04, Dale W. Carder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote: >> >>> Having slightly lost track of what everybody is using for peering >>> routers >>> these days, what is the consensus about the best alternative to Juniper >>> M >>> series routers? >> >> have you looked at the MX series? > > +1 > ~Chris > >> >> Dale >>
I had looked briefly, does anybody here actually use them as peering routers? I've seen a few implementations using them in the MPLS P and PE router roles but never as border routers. If there is some precedent for using them in this role that's good to hear and I'll take another look, I was loath to move away from Juniper as our current boxes are been the model of reliability. Cheers Gary
