Basically the organisation that I'm working for will not have the skills in house to support a linux or bsd box. They will have trouble with supporting the BGP configuration, however I don't think they will be happy with me if I leave them with a linux box when they don't have linux/unix resource internally. At least with a Cisco or Juniper they are familiar with IOS and it won't be too foreign to them.
On Sun 11:30 PM , "Renato Frederick" <freder...@dahype.org> wrote: > There are any problems with quagga+BSD/Linux that you know or something > like that? > > Or in your scenario a "cisco/juniper box" is a requirement? > > I'm asking this because I'm always running BGP with upstreams providers > using quagga on BSD and everything is fine until now. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: > Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 8:39 PM > To: > Subject: Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? > > > > > So if my requirements are as follows: > > > > - BGP router capable of holding full Internet routing table. (whether I > > > go for partial or full, I think I want something with full capability). > > > > - Capable of pushing 100meg plus of mixed traffic. > > > > What are my options? I want to exclude openbsd, or linux with quagga. > > Probably looking at Cisco or Juniper products, but interested > > in any other alternatives people suggest. I realise this is quite a > broad > > question, but hoping this will provide a starting point. Oh and > > if I have missed any specs I should have included above, please let me > > know. > > > > Thanks > > > > Adel > > >
