How about unused and/or private/local diffserve code points?
Ron Bonica wrote: > Folks, > > I would love to see the IETF OPSEC WG publish a document on the pros and > cons of filtering optioned packets. > > Would anybody on this list be willing to author an Internet Draft? > > Ron > (co-director IETF O&M Area) > > Luca Tosolini wrote: >> Experts, >> out of the well-known values for ip options: >> >> x...@r4# set ip-options ? >> Possible completions: >> <range> Range of values >> [ Open a set of values >> any Any IP option >> loose-source-route Loose source route >> route-record Route record >> router-alert Router alert >> security Security >> stream-id Stream ID >> strict-source-route Strict source route >> timestamp Timestamp >> >> I can only think of: >> - RSVP using router-alert >> - ICMP using route-record, timestamp >> >> But I can not think of any other use of any other IP option. >> Considering the security hazard that they imply, I am therefore thinking >> to drop them. >> >> Is any other ip options used by: ospf, isis, bgp, ldp, igmp, pim, bfd? >> Thanks, >> Luca. >> >> >> >
