Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Steve Bertrand <st...@ibctech.ca > <mailto:st...@ibctech.ca>> wrote: > > Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 08:09:40PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> I am AS14270. BGP with me... its been two years... you've got to > have an > >> engineer who can set up a session by now, no? > > > > Sounds like someone needs to send you a copy of "They Just Don't > Want To > > Peer With You". :) > > ...and directly to your statement: > > send the book along. I'm not looking for a 'peer'. > > This is a situation that my PROVIDER won't set up a BGP SESSION with me, > and they continue to STATICALLY ROUTE my ARIN ALLOCATED block to me. > > They advertise it from their AS. Their AS advertises known bad space to > me (which I've complained about). Their AS, In my humble opinion, is > completely unreliable and non-trustworthy. My ARIN block is advertised > by them, and I HATE it. They will not respond to me when I ask them to > allow me to advertise my own space to them. > > Of course, having them 'listen' for my space, it would also allow me to > advertise to other 'providers' which would allow for redundancy.... > > Note...I have a /21. It's not like I'm advertising a /24, nor am I > trying to do something that isn't in the best interest of my community. > > Steve > > > > What's the block?
Martin, I learnt early on that NANOG is not suitable to stage a reliable 'notification'. I was merely remarking (perhaps out of frustration) on the thread. Steve
