You are still confusing peering and transit with ability to announce your IP prefix via BGP.
It may be very useful to others willing to help, if you provide a better detail of what kind of recipe you want to cook instead of asking where you can find the individual ingredients. Regards Jorge On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Ken Gilmour <ken.gilm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/10/31 Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us>: >> Ken Gilmour wrote: >>> >>> We have BGP4 networks in other locations (IPv4 and IPv6) - Costa Rica >>> being one of the places that don't have it... We would really like to >>> be able to implement it here but are finding it difficult to find SPs >>> who support Customers who advertise their own PI space. >>> >> >> It doesn't sound like you want peering - specifically AT&T's answer >> implies they think you want settlement-free peering when you just want >> to announce your routes via BGP (aka paid transit). >> >> ~Seth >> >> > > Yes - Sorry my initial approach to NANOG was not very specific! > However my approach to the SPs was very specific (and ADN understood > exactly what I wanted when I first approached them and are working on > a quote)... I specifically asked how we would go about getting a > second point-to-point link and peer with them over that link (and for > existing providers such as ICE and RACSA) how we could upgrade our > current contract to allow us to announce our own PI space... I am not > sure how I could be any more specific than that... > > Ken > >
