Just FYI the colo4jax guys got back to me and it is a stale ARIN db
entry - I guess they don't update it as quickly as I thought. So this
is now just a normal case of spam.
Leslie
Leslie wrote:
Yes, unallocated (at least according to ARIN's whois db) but not
unannounced - obviously our network can get to the space or else I
wouldn't be having a spam problem with them! I'm actually seeing this
/20 as advertised through Savvis from AS40430
It seems to me like the best solution might be a semi-hacky solution of
asking arin (and other IRR's) if i can copy its DB and creating an
internal peer which null routes unallocated blocks (updated nightly?)
Has anyone seen an IRR's DB's not being updated for more than 30 days
after allocations? I always assumed that they are quickly updated.
Thanks again,
Leslie
Jon Lewis wrote:
Unallocated doesn't mean non-routed. All a spammer needs is a
willing/non-filtering provider doing BGP with them, and they can
announce any space they like, send out some spam, and then pull the
announcement. Next morning, when you see the spam and try to figure
out who to send complaints to, you're either going to complain to the
wrong people or find that whois is of no help.
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Church, Charles wrote:
This is puzzling me. If it's from non-announced space, at some point
some router should report no route to it. How is the TCP handshake
performed to allow a sync to turn into spam?
Chuck
Chuck Church
Network Planning Engineer, CCIE #8776
Harris Information Technology Services
DOD Programs
1210 N. Parker Rd. | Greenville, SC 29609
Office: 864-335-9473 | Cell: 864-266-3978
--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry