Michael Peddemors wrote: > On October 12, 2009, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >> In summary: HE has worked tirelessly and mostly thanklessly to promote >> v6. They have done more to bring v6 to the forefront than any other >> network. But at the end of day, despite HE's valiant effort on v6, v6 >> has all the problems of v4 on the backbone, PLUS growing pains. Which >> means it is difficult to rely on it, as v4 has enough dangers on its >> own. >> > > And don't forget.. Once IPv6 gets to the mainstream.. IP Reputation lists are > going to have a real fun time :) Spammers would love to see IPv6 in place I > am > sure.
You seem to have concluded that blacklisting a prefix is much harder in ipv6 than it is in v4... > ;) Routing IPv6 is going to require one heck of a thinking re- > adjustment. Would be nice to just leave IPv6 in the premises, and keep IPv4 > for routing. >
