Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > >> sure would be nice if there was a diagnosis before the lynching > > If this happened in v4, would customers care 'why' it happened? > Obviously not.
I suspect more NAT will become a better solution than migrating to IPv6 if/when runout becomes a problem because there's just not enough visibility or providers that take it seriously enough for IPv6 to be a viable solution. I try to do my part but it's a horrible pain. > Why should v6 be any different? It either is or is not production > ready. I'm interested in HE's view on that. > As far as HE goes, they're so pro-IPv6 I would be surprised if anything intentionally bad was going on. I wish more providers had their attitude towards IPv6. ~Seth
