This only protects ISPs from, upon being served notice, being liable for content A majority of the CDA was overturned, as it violates both first and fifth amendments. What is left of it only applies to ISPs PUBLISHING (*not* filtering) content
This is Net Neutrality realm On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Andrew D Kirch <trel...@trelane.net> wrote: > William Pitcock wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 23:15 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote: > > > >> Okay, so how do YOU block the attacks from eating up your bandwidth > >> and filling > >> up your logs without blocking the entire IP? > >> > > > > If I was AT&T, I would purchase DDoS filtering equipment and run it at > > edge where all of my traffic is peering anyway. > > > > This discussion is about AT&T, not you. > > > > William > > > While I agree, I certainly believe that due to the nature of some of the > content > on 4chan, AT&T can make a strong "Good Samaritan" claim under 47USC230. > There's > always TOR. > > > Andrew D Kirch > >
