In article <4a50bb87.8000...@airwire.ie>, Martin List-Petersen
<mar...@airwire.ie> writes
Calling it a lame web 2.0 is pretty much off, when it's actually used
for something sensible.
I seem to be trying to find the middle ground between members of the
public who think "The Internet isn't appropriate because they didn't
teach it to me in college 20 years ago" and those who say "Web 2.0 isn't
appropriate because they didn't teach it to me in college 5 years ago".
Shouldn't we at least be giving it the benefit of the doubt?
Since when has, what has been teached in college ever been a defining
standard for what is happening on the internet or what the trend in
computing is ?
It shouldn't be, but I'm guessing this is where much of the conservatism
is coming from.
--
Roland Perry
