On Thu, Jun 25, 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Rod - you wouldnt qualify as an ISP - or even a "provider of an > interactive computer service" to go by the language in 47 USC 230, by > simply running a TOR exit node.
Ah, but would an ISP which currently enjoys whatever the current definition of "common carrier" is these days, running a TOR node, still be covered by said provisions? Adrian
