> > On the DWDM side, expect to add between 0.3W of energy @ 100G, and 0.6W > @ 400G, when encryption is enabled. > > Something to keep in mind if power and/or thermal management are crucial > for you.
Are you talking about L1OE here, not MACSEC? On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 9:42 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: > > > > On 12/19/24 03:07, Jason Bothe via NANOG wrote: > > > Quite a bit I’d say, particularly in WAN. It’s an easy and excellent > > go-to for line rate encryption along waves and some transparent layer > > 2 services state they support it but haven’t had an opportunity to > > test personally. Double check the implementation for continuation of > > rolling keys and so forth to ensure your expectations are met. > > On the DWDM side, expect to add between 0.3W of energy @ 100G, and 0.6W > @ 400G, when encryption is enabled. > > Something to keep in mind if power and/or thermal management are crucial > for you. > > Mark. >
