> On Nov 18, 2024, at 08:04, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > > Matt Corallo wrote on 18/11/2024 12:53: >> But, no, of course a RIR won’t ignore a court order, indeed that’d be >> nuts, but we could ensure that doing so takes some nontrivial (human) >> time during which the operator community can decide whether they wish >> to respond with a new anchor/ignoring the new ROA/etc. > You mean obstruction of justice, with intent? > > Let us know how that goes. No, obviously this would have to be done in software on the validator end. Matt
- RE: Implementing Dece... Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
- RE: Implementing Dece... Brandon Price
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockc... Matt Corallo
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with B... Seth David Schoen
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI wi... Matt Corallo
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with B... Christopher Morrow
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI wi... Matt Corallo
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPK... Niels Bakker
- Re: Implementing Decentralized... Matt Corallo
- Re: Implementing Decentra... Nick Hilliard
- Re: Implementing Dece... Matt Corallo
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with B... Tom Beecher
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI wi... Matt Corallo
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPK... Tom Beecher
- Re: Implementing Decentralized... Matt Corallo
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPK... Niels Bakker
- Re: Implementing Decentralized... Matt Corallo
- Re: Implementing Decentra... Job Snijders via NANOG
- Re: Implementing Dece... Brandon Z.
- Re: Implementing Dece... Matt Corallo
- Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain... Brandon Z.