Might have been this one? Light, Camera, Actions: characterizing the usage of IXPs’ action BGP communities
https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/4ed80bc4-c4d5-4a90-9e7c-e7a9a28ff658/content Cheers, Marinho. > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:00:50 -0300 > From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdoug...@gmail.com> > To: Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> > Cc: Job Snijders <j...@fastly.com>, nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild! > Message-ID: > <caker4rqe+drsgglek6efovmo4xajhkgcvrvn9eznrbrj+dw...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Em qui., 5 de set. de 2024 ?s 14:35, Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> escreveu: > >> >> This may well be intentional >> > In addition to their own intention, they should ask if the other side > agrees with that. > > I don't remember which research paper compiled this. > But the top 5 ASNs targeted by the no_export_to<asn> BGP communities at IXP > Route-Servers say a lot about who mostly causes this type of problem. > > -- > Douglas Fernando Fischer > Eng? de Controle e Automa??o >
