Doug,

I'd recommend giving this a read:

https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/diagnosing-network-issues-with-mtr/#verify-packet-loss

Your trace shows nothing of concern.

-Matt

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:28 AM Doug Barrett <d...@barrettech.com> wrote:

> We’re seeing 30-50% packet loss on a hop around what we believe is Chicago
> area.  Please reach out off-list if you can help.
>
> xxxx -> voiptest.sea.telecomsvc.com(64.282024-09-10T11:02:57-0500
>
>                                               Packets               Pings
>
> Host                                       Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best
> Wrst StDev
>
> 1. xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.net(172.27.xxx.x)       0.0%    53    0.5   0.4
> 0.2   0.8   0.1
>
> 2. 10.1.xxx.xxx (10.1.xxx.xxx)              0.0%    53    2.6   4.5   1.7
> 29.1   4.2
>
> 3. 69.217.x.xx (69.217.x.xx)                0.0%    53    3.7   4.7   1.9
> 15.0   2.8
>
> 4. 12.91.81.197 (12.91.81.197)              0.0%    53   10.5  12.3   8.9
> 21.5   3.0
>
> 5. 12.122.162.186 (12.122.162.186)          0.0%    53   19.4  20.1  16.0
> 46.0   4.8
>
> 6. cgcil22crs.ip.att.net(12.122.1.129)     0.0%    53   25.7  20.5  13.3
> 38.9   4.5
>
> *7. 32.130.17.76 (32.130.17.76)             36.5%    52   14.6  16.9
> 12.6  34.4   5.4*
>
> 8. 32.130.24.205 (32.130.24.205)            0.0%    52   24.0  18.9  14.6
> 35.1   4.8
>
> 9. 12.116.153.210 (12.116.153.210)          0.0%    52   17.3  31.8  15.5
> 133.0  26.3
>
> 10. 141.101.73.202 (141.101.73.202)          0.0%    52   26.0  30.8  14.0
> 131.5  25.0
>
> 11. 172.70.125.88 (172.70.125.88)            0.0%    52   16.1  17.4
> 13.2  23.9   2.4
>
>     172.70.125.46 (172.70.125.46)
>
>     172.70.125.213 (172.70.125.213)
>
>     172.70.125.165 (172.70.125.165)
>
>     172.70.125.214 (172.70.125.214)
>
>     172.70.125.87 (172.70.125.87)
>
>     172.70.125.207 (172.70.125.207)
>
>     172.70.125.199 (172.70.125.199)
>
>     172.70.125.161 (172.70.125.161)
>
> 12. 172.70.125.157 (172.70.125.157)          0.0%    52   17.7  18.8
> 13.7  36.3   4.7
>
>     172.70.125.206 (172.70.125.206)
>
>     172.70.125.170 (172.70.125.170)
>
>     172.70.125.181 (172.70.125.181)
>
>     172.70.125.18 (172.70.125.18)
>
>     172.70.125.98 (172.70.125.98)
>
>     172.70.125.120 (172.70.125.120)
>
>     172.70.125.176 (172.70.125.176)
>
>     172.70.125.161 (172.70.125.161)
>
> 13. 172.70.125.89 (172.70.125.89)            0.0%    52   28.6  19.3
> 13.8  36.1   5.6
>
>     172.70.125.199 (172.70.125.199)
>
>     172.70.125.115 (172.70.125.115)
>
>     172.70.125.19 (172.70.125.19)
>
>     172.70.125.25 (172.70.125.25)
>
>     172.70.125.108 (172.70.125.108)
>
>     172.70.125.102 (172.70.125.102)
>
>     172.70.125.137 (172.70.125.137)
>
>     172.70.125.165 (172.70.125.165)
>
> 14. (waiting for reply)
>
> 15. 64.28.116.197 (64.28.116.197)            0.0%    52   61.1  65.0
> 59.2  95.6   7.4
>
>     64.28.116.195 (64.28.116.195)
>
> 16. voiptest.sea.telecomsvc.com(64.28.122.  0.0%    52   61.0  65.2
> 59.3  85.8   6.7
>
>

-- 
Matt Erculiani

Reply via email to